Search for: "State v House" Results 5541 - 5560 of 28,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am by Venkat
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Today, the primary case associated with restrictive covenants is Shelley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
Heath notes that this technology was mentioned in the recent Tenth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by The Berniard Law Firm
On August 15, 2010, House Bill by Republican representative from LaPlace, Nickie Monica, went into effect and will cause substantial changes for second time DWI offenders in the state of Louisiana. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
On August 15, 2010, House Bill by Republican representative from LaPlace, Nickie Monica, went into effect and will cause substantial changes for second time DWI offenders in the state of Louisiana. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of Town of Islip v Caviglia delineates the proper balance between community needs and free expression under our Constitution in this state. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:36 pm by Laura Orr
Oregon Constitution Article V (or read the entire Oregon Constitution and early Oregon Constitutions): “Section 8. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:36 pm by Laura Orr
Oregon Constitution Article V (or read the entire Oregon Constitution and early Oregon Constitutions): “Section 8. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:47 am
--Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third CircuitOpinion Date: 4/1/09Cite: Hixson Autoplex of Alexandria, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by anbrandon
The court dipped into legal esoterica in the Olive opinion, addressing at length whether one of two money-laundering counts should have merged in light of United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Some proposed settlement agreements may require court or agency approval Cheeks v Freeport Pancake House, Inc., USCA, 2ndCircuit, Docket 14-299 CVDorian Cheeks sued Freeport Pancake House [FPH] seeking to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under both the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act [FLSA] and New York State’s Labor Law. [read post]