Search for: "University System v. State" Results 5541 - 5560 of 8,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 12:01 pm by Joseph Tomain
  When I teach Cyberlaw, I include Porter v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States The Transparency Project highlights new laws focusing on press freedom presented in the recent President’s View number 18. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
As such, the article concludes by proposing ways for Congress to amend section 1605(a)(3) to facilitate a more just system for reclaiming Nazi-looted art. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Askari, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of hepatology, in the University of Michigan Health System. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
   By quantum entanglement, physicists generally mean a state where two particles, either because of how they were generated or how they have engaged, become a system such that action on one particle affects the other, no matter what the other’s location.[10] Personal data has this quality as well. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court established the constitutional basis for using paid informants in 1966 with U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Entrapment has similarly failed as a defence in terrorism prosecutions in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:18 am by Dennis Crouch
” In ASCARCO Inc. v Kadish, 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the Supreme Court held that while the state-court plaintiffs-respondents lacked Federal Article III standing, the Court had jurisdiction, because the petitioners seeking review had suffered “a specific injury stemming from the [adverse] state-court decree. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:06 pm by Lynn McDonough
Supreme Court attempted to end the practice of states moving people with disabilities out of their communities and into isolated hospital facilities, holding in Olmstead v. [read post]