Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 5541 - 5560 of 66,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm by Russell Engler
From an Access to Justice and Civil Right to Counsel perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by appealattorneylaw
  To see the City of Orlando’s jurisdictional brief, click here. (2) State v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
The BOP has the statutory authority to effect concurrent service of federal and state sentences and is well situated to take into account both the intent of the first sentencing judge and the specific facts developed in the second sentencing. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
  It may also well be supported by precedent in the California Court of Appeal, which has previously done some similar things.But I gotta tell you, this is way beyond what the Supreme Court has ever done -- or even come close to doing -- and quite squarely departs from the traditional constraints that the Due Process Clause has been held to place on the extension of state law claim preclusion.More specifically, I don't see how this result is at all consistent… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
But if the act is repeated on a number of occasions, the collective course of conduct may well amount to harassment. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It would even be open to liberal red-state supreme courts to find a state constitutional right to abortion, at least pending recall or reversal by the voters.But now suppose the Supreme Court were to overrule Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by R. David Donoghue
Plaintiff Airoom accused defendants of infringing its trademarks, as well as related state law claims. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm
The state's court of appeals recently issued a ruling on an Indiana child custody and support case. [read post]