Search for: "1 Gas Generator" Results 5561 - 5580 of 6,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by J. Mark Robinette
  The gist of those dissents is that the General Assembly meant to write a true Pugh clause, but as the dissenters note, it is up to the General Assembly to change its statutes, not the courts. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by J. Mark Robinette
Code Ann. 15-73-201:Lease extended by production -- Scope(a) The term of an oil and gas, or oil or gas, lease extended by production in quantities in lands in one (1) section or pooling unit in which there is production shall not be extended in lands in sections or pooling units under the lease where there has been no production or exploration. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am by Jessica Albin
Paterson issued Executive Order No. 41, effectuating a moratorium on horizontal hydraulic fracturing drilling for natural gas (known as “fracking”) until at least July 1, 2011, but allowing vertical fracking. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 pm
" The claim language itself (claim 1) had "low flow rate" at "less than about 1 liter/minute. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:03 am by The Legal Blog
"I don't take negative retainers," shrugs Rohatgi, former additional solicitor general. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
Carnes, supra, 236 Ga. at 35(1). ? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:41 pm by Justin E. Gray
At issue on appeal was the district court's construction of the claim term "low flow rate" as "a rate of flow less than about 1 liter/minute and producing flow velocities less than 19 km/hour such that the gas exiting through the distal end opening forms a non-laminar inert gas temperature," after finding that the patentee distinguished its invention over the prior art based on the flow rate. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the skilled person, despite any general knowledge he may have as to how two-step processes could in theory be conducted, has no reason to interpret claim 1 of the contested patent differently from the way in which he would normally understand it. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:48 am by Kelly Becker
BACT should generally not be applied to regulate the applicant’s purpose or objective for the proposed facility. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:42 am by rshapiro
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:23 am by J. Mark Robinette
For example, if well #1 costs $2,000,000 and the participating owner owns 64 acres out of a 640 acre unit, the JIBS for that owner for well #1 will be $200,000. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:23 am by J. Mark Robinette
For example, if well #1 costs $2,000,000 and the participating owner owns 64 acres out of a 640 acre unit, the JIBS for that owner for well #1 will be $200,000. [read post]