Search for: "David Reader"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 8,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 11:33 pm
Raffles and Fairmont (Picture Danny Friedmann)Once every other year the IP Academy of Singapore handpicks IP experts and brings them all together at the Fairmont, opposite the Raffles Hotel at the Global Forum on Intellectual Property 2011.Professor David Llewelyn made an excellent line up of speakers and IP Dragon is very happy to be give two presentations and launch the TP website. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
Using their clinically proven, renowned Four Step method that increases awareness of deceptive brain messages, readers learn how to access and bolster – most often without medications – the loving, smart inner guide within themselves to prevent the deceiving brain from taking control of their lives. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:19 am
(David Bernstein) On Friday, the Federalist Society will be holding its annual faculty conference. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:28 pm
UPDATE: On the other hand, reader David Skurnick offers a plausible counterhypothesis: “The study found a correlation between alcohol consumption and monogamy, so the authors conclude that more drinking causes more monogamy. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm
David Kline Gaby Longsworth Scott A. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
SOLO IP arch-blogger Filemot has posted her IP Predictions for 2011 here; she challenges readers to add their own. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:44 pm
(The blog thanks David Remes for sharing the tables with our readers.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:35 pm
There is, of course, immense pressure on the press to come up with something which catches the attention of its readers in cases of this kind but this is no excuse for this kind of reporting. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
It is always a pleasure to hear from Lord Shagger, a former Partner at Muttley Dastardly LLP. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 5:56 am
Musical director of David Frost. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:41 am
If this feed is not in your RSS reader or Newstex, it infringes the copyright. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
In the old days it was Jerry & David who curated our links – now it’s anybody who YOU choose to curate your links. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
On behalf of Merpel, the AmeriKat, Tufty, Birgit, David, Mark, Matt and Neil, the IPKat takes this opportunity to wish all of his readers a very happy new calendar year, starting in just a few short hours time -- unless you are Japanese, an Australian, or similar -- in which case you are ahead of our time, if not your own. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
Patrick McDermott of Annapolis, David C. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
[welcome Mickey Kaus/Newsweek readers] “The federal government has been in the business of micro-managing our kids’ lunches for 30 years” [David Gratzer/Examiner] St. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
by Paul Alan Levy We have previously blogged about the crucial role played by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in protecting the ability of consumers to speak effectively about corporate or political wrongdoing, by protecting the hosts of web sites and email services from being sued over the contents of communications that are made using their services. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:02 pm
The very sharp-looking Maryland Criminal Law Post is written by Baltimore native David Waranch. [read post]
COLMAN MCCARTHY: Now that Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell Has Been Repealed, Here’s Another Excuse For Keeping…
30 Dec 2010, 11:54 am
And in response to Jason Johnson’s Thucydides quote above, reader David Swager writes: “Actually, the scholars are already cowards AND fools (notable exceptions, of course) while the warriors are heroic and highly ingenious. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 8:39 am
One reader reports: They had a kiosk at the OC Fred Meyer yesterday. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm
(as Oliver might have said to Stan): If I were to state a theory about something, then offer two examples of incidents (which I claimed were different) as supposed examples of the application of that theory, but then it turned out that (1) the two examples were equivalent and not different and (2) in any event the examples at best didn't show the theory in operation and at worst contradicted a basic premise of the theory you'd be entitled… [read post]
