Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 9,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm
The D.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:08 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Elizabeth Wydra lists four reasons why, in her view, the case “still matters even in a post-nuclear world. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
., 840 F.2d 935, 937-38 (D.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:35 pm
The D.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
Renowned competition and consumer protection attorney will co-lead national Privacy and Data Protection team Washington, D.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
United States, 915 F.2d 699, 712 (D.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
Patent Office are scheduled to be delivered Jan. 17 to the federal district court of appeals in Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Next Tuesday, the D.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 11:30 pm
” In re D.C., 203 N.J. 545, 551 (2010). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:20 pm
Petitioner asserted that she hired Cullen and Powers of Miles & Stockbridge P.C. out of Washington, D.C., because of their experience at trying Hague Convention cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:03 am
NLRB, 395 F.2d 622(D.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:38 am
Authority from the D.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:02 am
” On Friday, a federal judge ruled that the National Security Agency’s data collection program does not violate the Constitution – a ruling that conflicts with an earlier decision by another federal judge in Washington, D.C., and therefore increases the likelihood that the Supreme Court will weigh in. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
Obama (the District of D.C. case). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
The first key test will be how the D.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 11:10 am
After the D.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:26 am
The Federal Circuit spoke to this in the matter of Apple Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 4:54 am
As a legal matter, and as a matter of common sense, the fact that the United States, through the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (“AUMF”), authorized the detention, interrogation, and possibly even torture of enemies and suspected enemies of the United States is not an unlimited authorization to imprison and torture anyone for any reason or no reason at all. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
Ultimately, what matters is "exposure" but whether someone "exposes" something is dependent on realistic, not theoretical possibilities. [read post]
