Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 5,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
“To protect the public interest” is the answer to the question of whose interests law societies should prioritize when they do regulate lawyers, but it does not shed light on why we regulate lawyers in the first place. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
The text follows: The business judgment rule pervades every aspect of state corporate law, from director negligence to self-dealing transactions to dismissal of shareholder litigation and so on. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
See, Astral Media Radio Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Could not find a Criminal Prosecution job after passing the CA State Bar, and the woman I sat next t [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
The complaint alleged “systematic, widespread, and unauthorized copying and distribution of a vast amount of copyrighted works”, and argued that GSU “has facilitated, enabled, encouraged, and induced Georgia State professors to upload and post to these systems - and Georgia State students simultaneously to download, view, print, copy, and distribute - many, if not all, of the assigned readings for a particular course without limitation. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
He clearly and explicitly stated that outright withdrawal from the Convention was one of the options he was considering – the first time I have heard a sitting Lord Chancellor float this possibility. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Carl v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:37 am
(See Virginia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
Again, however, removal of any bar of immunity does not establish that Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Since the board considered that the interpretation of the process exclusion contained in A 53(b) needed clarification in the light of R 26(5), it referred corresponding questions to the EBA. [20] In view of the responses given by the EBA in G 1/08, [the patent proprietor] deleted the process claims so that the claim requests now on file are restricted to product claims directed to tomato fruits or tomato fruit products […]. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:45 am
A number of our critics have told us privately that they never doubted our integrity, and we regret that they did not see fit to state that publicly. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
