Search for: "Little v State" Results 5561 - 5580 of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 8:53 am by Pillsbury's Construction Law Team
 In Attys React To High Court’s Auto Service Advisers OT Ruling, Judish stated: “The Encino Motorcars decision will have little direct effect on the scope of FLSA overtime exemptions. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:53 am
As I have been waiting for the USSC to issue an opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Too late, says the court in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
An interesting little puzzle: if a public entity and a "gad-fly" advocacy group enter into a settlement agreement whereby the gad-fly will not address any further challenges to the public entity's conduct that he originally challenged through litigation, will a later complaint by the public entity for the breach of that settlement agreement against the gad-fly be precluded by the Minnesota anti-SLAPP statute? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
Controversy over a lawyer's suspension and subsequent taking of the bar exam for re-admission to the bar was not sufficient to make the attorney a public figure in Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If there is no money in treatment, they don’t want to spend money making new drugs with exception of those diseases granted orphan drug status by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and even in these cases, major drug makers usually have little interest. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
  Cases should not “won” or “lost” on the basis of some typo or other ministerial error.** See, e.g., Kerman Equities v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Bormes – a Little Tucker Act case involving issues of the waiver of sovereign immunity and the federal fair credit reporting Act;  Arkansas Game & Fishing – a takings case asking whether flooding over a specific six year period of time was a taking or a tort; Fisher v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am by Anushila Shaw
  As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic  v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am by INFORRM
”  The judgment states that “[i]t would therefore be little short of a breach of faith for the judiciary not to give effect to the 10% increase in damages recommended by Sir Rupert“. [read post]
13 May 2008, 12:46 pm
It is a little reminder... of the good work done by public defenders every day. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
  I was alerted to Cannae Holding's conversion proposal by an opinion piece by Nevada Secretary of State Francisco V. [read post]