Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm
At first blush, Duncan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:39 am
The Guantanamo cases will establish the procedures for habeas proceedings of all prisoners in connection with the current armed conflict who are entitled to seek relief under [habeas law], potentially including even United States citizens detained within the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
In his concurrence to the Court’s dismissal (as moot) of the petition for certification in Biden v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:18 am
Nafta Traders, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And that decision's from no schlub of a court: it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 8:26 pm
Both Michigan and the United States concede that courts disagree about whether restitution is civil or criminal. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
NBCUniversal, LLC, the most recent of a series of petitions asking the court to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
(quotingKerr v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 12:11 pm
The United States has developed a uniquely American approach to this issue. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Bilski v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Therefore, the panel has agreed to affirm the sentence in the instant case, including the enhancement based on acquitted conduct; but the panel strongly recommends that counsel for the defendant file a petition for en banc rehearing on the question of whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
