Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 5561 - 5580 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Therefore, the case was transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am by Don Geiger and Eric Gill
To prove damages at trial, Cyntec presented a market-share lost profits theory, alleging that 27 companies purchased Chilisin’s accused chokes outside the United States and then imported devices including the chokes into the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
  The United States recently filed a petition for certioriari in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Jeff Welty
This week saw several interesting developments at the United States Supreme Court, plus the videotaped arrest of a public defender in the hallway of a courthouse. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has identified a problem with Qualcomm (and in some cases maybe also third parties) demanding overredactions. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
As of 2013, according to the UCLA’s Williams Institute, there were about 130,000 same-sex marriages in nineteen states across the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:07 am by Beth Graham
  In their scholarly article, the authors examine where employment arbitration stands across the nation following several recent significant United States Supreme Court decisions regarding arbitration. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:14 pm
Here is the abstract: This article addresses not only offshore detainees at Guantánamo and elsewhere, but also the two Americans and one Qatari held in the United States as enemy combatants. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
John Gray, Christian Keller, Kyle Martin, and Aaron ShepardCase Number: 15-cv-00551 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case Filed: February 5, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 2, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-30 SEC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
California has received such a waiver which has allowed other states to adopt California’s more stringent standards. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by PaulKostro
The United States Supreme Court has recognized that applying minimum contacts principles to matrimonial litigation is a fact-sensitive endeavor. [read post]