Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 36,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
And while State v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:49 pm
But the Supreme Court stated as early as United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
More specifically it is a reminder that the orthodox structures for the allocation of liability within and among enterprises, and between enterprises and their owners, is only as powerful as the core organizing principles on which they are based. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The first, Sonic-Calabasas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:35 am
In California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
It stated that, in City of Anaheim v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) United States of America v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
In addition the Corut did not rule any federal statute to be beyond Congress’ interstate commerce power between 1936 and 1995, and has since done so only twice, including the 1995 ruling [in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:12 am
In the 1982 landmark case of Plyler v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
Statements in open court are a powerful means of vindication as they will invariably attract some press interest. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:04 pm
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
It was also noted that the power to make such orders must be used sparingly, however, and that as this case rested on a possible breach of ECHR, art 3 it carried a different weight to one involving an article besides art 2 or art 3. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:46 am
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s development and application of the doctrine of “prosecution history disclaimer” is consistent with fundamental principles of separation of powers, the Patent Act, and long-established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Kennedy believes in the "dignity of states. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
First, what does the treaty obligate the United States to do? [read post]
