Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 16,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
Although the State possesses a "strong interest in enforcing its criminal judgments without undue interference from the federal courts," Hill v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:19 pm
Hit and run laws differ by state of course. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 3:18 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:44 pm
The latter happened recently in Sanchez v CleanNet USA Inc.. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:26 am
Henkel and Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:20 pm
Obviously, the President can do nothing about state laws on this subject.Third, mandatory death penalties are contrary to the Supreme Court's decisions in Woodson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
The case is State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
The process of questioning potential jurors in a death penalty case, and weeding out those who hold such strong feelings for or against capital punishment that they would be unable to apply the law, is known as "death-qualifying" a jury. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am
Long Island Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, a strong supporter concluded that it’s a done deal. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
State Atty’s office. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:59 am
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decided on rehearing en banc: May 25, 2011 http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/08-1511.pdf The Federal Circuit has changed the rules governing the patent infringement defense of inequitable conduct, or as it is sometimes called “fraud on the patent office. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:17 am
One case currently being litigated, Caner v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
But Intel (& temporarily Apple) v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Galardi South Enters. d/b/a The Onyx, and Stevenson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Galardi South Enters. d/b/a The Onyx, and Stevenson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am
TransPerfect President and CEO Phil Shawe stated, “We have competed against Semantix in the Nordics for more than 15 years and have admired their leadership position and strong reputation. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:07 am
In the United States we have a strong belief that, whether rich or poor, we are all entitled to our day in court. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:05 am
For a good summary of the law, see Wagenhoffer v. [read post]
