Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5561 - 5580 of 10,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
Now Richard pops up with this top-up post to bring readers up-to-date upon the state of the new directive negotiations on Nice classification and the latest version of the EU IP trade mark system. * Honda v Patmanidi: CJEU quietly gives a reasoned orderLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by the Greek Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon for a preliminary ruling concerning international… [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm by Matt Danzer
United States favors judicial discretion in severance decisions, directing courts to focus on the complexity of the case, degrees of culpability, and the facts. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by David
” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm by Ken White
Here's how the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — hardly a bastion of liberalism — recently summarized it: Similar to the reasoning we set forth for employer liability for co-worker harassment, “an employer cannot avoid Title VII liability for [third-party] harassment by adopting a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ strategy.' “ Ocheltree v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:51 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Let’s assume that driverless cars are remarkably safe: Instead of the 30,000+ people who now die annually in car accidents in the United States, suppose driverless cars result in a mere 10,000 deaths every year. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:01 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that RESPA section 8 does not prohibit a single service provider from marking up the cost of a settlement service, such as a credit report. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
I was so sorry for him as Tillman made protest against equal suffrage for the Negro race in the United States that I must have missed much of Tillman’s oratorical effect. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that RESPA section 8 does not prohibit a single party from marking up the cost of a settlement service. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The General Counsel to the United States Catholic Conference at the time, Mark Chopko, testified before the House Committee on the Judiciary a year before RFRA was first enacted in 1993 that the bishops were concerned that RFRA might “be used to promote access to abortion. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
Judge Wilson, joined by a visiting judge, issued this opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
 and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:15 pm
   Procedural History"DataTern appeals from the [United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]. [read post]