Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
In this episode of Entertainment Law Update, Entertainment lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennet review the latest cases and controversies in the entertainment industry. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:17 pm
” Id. at 8 (quoting Softview LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:07 am
By Dennis Crouch In re MCM Portfolios LLC (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:46 am
Genericness is a question of fact, and the PTO must provide clear evidence thereof. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:48 am
The panel majority was unimpressed by the PTO's evidence, It noted that Wikipedia evidence, when uncorroborated, is "fraught with shortcomings." [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:05 pm
The petition of the day is: Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. 1st Media, LLC 12-1086 Issue: Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in restricting district courts’ equitable discretion in evaluating patent unenforceability, contrary to this Court’s precedent in Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
PTO Br. 24. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:02 pm
., LLC, et al., C.A. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
See In re Heeb Media LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1071 (TTAB 2008) (applicant's good intentions and inoffensive goods and services do not prevent finding that HEEB is disparaging; mixed opinion among members of the referenced group does not erase the perception of a substantial composite who find it disparaging). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 3:25 am
In re Stacked Wines, LLC, Serial No. 85129206 (September 4, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
In Field Hybrids, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:11 am
Carbon Audio, Inc. sought to register the mark CARBON AUDIO for "audio headphones; audio speaker enclosures; audio speakers; wireless indoor and outdoor speakers," but the PTO turned down the application, deeming the mark merely descriptive of the identified goods. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:06 pm
In Re Health Science Funding, LLC, Appeal No. 1054 (Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:07 am
Mayfair Wireless LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:46 am
Trademark Rule 2.41(b) says that a prior registration for the "same mark" may be accepted by the PTO. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:53 pm
On Demand Books LLC, C.A. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:12 pm
In Vermont, IPKat notes that Attorney General William Sorrell has entered an agreement with a firm called Patent & Trademark Agency, LLC, which sent letters offering to renew trademarks for a fee of between $985 and $1,750, a fee substantially higher than that charged by the actual PTO. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:20 pm
It is scheduled to hear arguments as an en banc court later this year in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
