Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 1,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
NT1 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 67 (QB) (18 January 2018) https://t.co/gfCZCY9xKn 2018-01-19 Piracy used to be file-sharing. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
Estate of Calderwood v ACE Group International LLC, __ AD3d __, 2017 NY Slip Op 08750 [1st Dept Dec. 14, 2017], involving a Delaware LLC in which the court held that the operating agreement’s provisions limiting the rights of the deceased member’s estate precluded the estate’s claim to full membership rights under Delaware statutory law. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Kapnick issued a scholarly decision for a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department in Estate of Calderwood v ACE Group Int’l, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 08750 [1st Dept Dec. 14, 2017]. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
Following Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30; [2004] 1 AC 260, this was fatal to the granting of third party debt orders. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
Ltd. v XL Insurance (Bermuda) Ltd. and ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., [2013] EWHC 349 (Comm) AstraZeneca Insurance Co. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
Ltd. v XL Insurance (Bermuda) Ltd. and ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd., [2013] EWHC 349 (Comm) AstraZeneca Insurance Co. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Howey Co., which states that a security is an investment contract in which a person 1) invests their money; 2) in a common enterprise; 3) with an expectation of profits; 4) based on the efforts of the promoter or a third party. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am by Barry Sookman
Our Federal Court recently granted an injunction in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by ASAD KHAN
Considering Tan Te Lam [1997] AC 97, his Lordship construed paras 22 and 29 restrictively and held that: 32. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
They have the same rights of free speech as anyone else, subject to the same constraints” (AG v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109, 201). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura and Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters
For policyholders, an important consequence of this scheme of dispute resolution is that little binding precedent has developed—or will, outside of the occasional litigation in the United States against ACE or XL that is not dismissed, develop—regarding interpretation of the Bermuda Form. [read post]