Search for: "Allen v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
Worse still for the client, the United States Supreme Court decided a case that would have benefitted the client had he raised the argument of improper notice.The court explains the underlying proceedings as follows:"On April 26, 2006, the United States Supreme Court decided Jones v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
State, 622 So. 2d 982, 983 (Fla. 1993);Wilson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:21 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his pun-filled, 10-page decision in Lee v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:42 am
That error raises questions about trial court practices in the Northern District of New York.The case is United States v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
United States, as well as a second case, Brown v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm
Blakeney endorsed the Third Circuit’s articulation of this concept in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:07 am
Only in the United States of America. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
United States: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979) (quoting Railway Mail Assn. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:54 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:30 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces) Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate Division Amicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Title: Allen v. [read post]
