Search for: "Andrews v. Peters" Results 541 - 560 of 665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
The Undark article that caught my attention was a history of the Daubert decision and the Bendectin litigation that gave rise to the Supreme Court case.[1] The author, Peter Andrey Smith, is a freelance reporter, who often covers science issues. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[Now I really want to think about norm violators v. norm entrepreneurs.]Commentators: Andrew Torrance: overgrazing leads to ostracization—there’s a dark side to IP-free zones. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 3:36 am by David Pocklington
  Although not reported, events at the Grade II* church King Charles the Martyr, Falmouth, have been of interest, and a summary has been posted, v infra. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
On 30 April 2024, the UPC’s Local Division Düsseldorf handed down a new chapter in the 10x Genomics saga. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:33 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’ More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 [read post]
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]