Search for: "Application of Cox" Results 541 - 560 of 856
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application to strike out a libel claim in Mayer v Hoar. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854 (25 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Vallen International Limited v Lewis & Anor [2012] EWHC B5 (QB) (25 June 2012) AXN & Ors v Worboys & Ors [2012] EWHC 1730 (QB) (25 June 2012) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency [2012] EWHC 1643 (QB) (20 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SMP Trustees Ltd, Re… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm by Ken
But apparently global skeptic conspiracies take all applicants now. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Cox, which concerned RC 4511.66, a statute which prohibits parking on a highway “outside a business or residence district. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:32 am by Bradley Coxe
Coxe is a practicing attorney in Wilmington, NC with Hodges & Coxe PC who specializes in Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Homeowner's Associations, Contract and Real Estate disputes and all forms of Civil Litigation. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
For instance, in In the Matter of the Application for Disciplinary Action Against William E. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
For instance, in In the Matter of the Application for Disciplinary Action Against William E. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
[5] The motion before me relates to an application under Rule 13.05 (7) to transfer the place of trial from Toronto to Hamilton [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cox Fibernet Va., Inc., 602 F.3d 1325, 1336-37 (Fed. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:15 pm by Bradley Coxe
    The problem with the logic that unmarried couples could avoid the harsh application of Amendment One by executing binding legal contracts with one another is that a number of important issues cannot be covered by such documents. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
It’s a big week coming up at the Leveson Inquiry, with appearances from the media owners: Aidan Barclay, Evgeny Lebedev, James Murdoch and Rupert Murdoch. “Plenty to talk about here,” Murdoch Snr has tweeted since arriving in the UK. “Ten lively energetic newspapers to consume.“ In this piece, the journalist Deborah Orr explores how Murdoch has ‘set the tone’ at his British tabloids. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
As Forbes suggests, most journalists “will not want Cox in their camp”. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Third Circuit Says No - bit.ly/HzginW (Leonard Deutchman) eDiscovery Dispute Yields Formal Recusal Request in ‘da Silva Moore’ - bit.ly/J8frLe (Sean Doherty) eDiscovery is About Trust and Transparency - bit.ly/Hq2UEG (Tim Leehealey) eDiscovery Lessons of “Downton Abbey” - bit.ly/HHQlbu (Erin Nealy Cox) eDiscovery – Outlook Data File Types - bit.ly/If8ir6 (Amy Bowser-Rollins) Electronic… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:12 pm by Mike Scarcella
Jenner associate James Cox in Washington, who argued for the plaintiffs in the D.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 2:57 am by David Lynn
Under Section 107(a) of the JOBS Act, a company may forgo any exemption and instead comply with the requirements applicable to an issuer that is not an emerging growth company. [read post]