Search for: "B. Bell"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 11:55 am
Both Bell and Coast Plaza contemplate causes of action under the UCL or at common law (breach of contract, implied-in-fact contract, equitable indemnity, comparative negligence, or other statutory or common law bases for liability) but did not definitively establish that there is a private cause of action under section 1371.4 to enforce violations of this law. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
The Court relied primarily on Bell Atl. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:18 am
Cir. 2008); see Bell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:33 pm
They’re only a snapshot of how well you displayed your ability at one particular time in the judgment of one particular professor, rather than a Scarlet Letter (whether A, B, or worse) sewn on for life. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
On June 8, 2011, the Western District of Pennsylvania, in Bell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Robert Bell and judgment entered on or about 29 November 2017 by Judge Joseph N. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
Minn. 2006); Bell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
” b.) [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Accordingly, Arnold J was able to find no infringement under Article 5(1)(b), or under Article 5(2); that the defendant had a good defence of descriptive use under Art 6(1)(b) and there was no passing off. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
’ Decision Master Bell examined each limb of the application in turn. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Bell is the newest director. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:42 am
§ 332(c)(7)(B)(iii). [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:20 am
” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm
P. 12(b)(6) and 8(a). [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Kloc, B. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
It filed a cross-claim contending that there had been a non-use by Gallo of the registered trade mark in terms of section 92(4)(b) and sought removal of the registered trademark.Gallo denied the non-use claim. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
Nicholas Mizera in the Huffpost describes the changes we’ve seen recently, Over the past decade or two, ownership of Canadian media has dwindled to four major corporations — Bell, Rogers, Telus and Shaw — which now control 70 per cent of the country’s mediascape. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Price and caps are the subject of this hearing with Bell arguing for an approach that will make it tougher for independent ISPs to compete. [read post]
