Search for: "Baker v. People"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
In the lead-up to oral arguments in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
The bakers all turned down the jobs on the grounds that the message sent by the proposed cakes was offensive or hateful. [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm
If a lawyer says she supports Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 12:01 pm
Many people believe if someone records them without their permission, the recording cannot be used in court. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
This opinion is considerably narrower than Judge Walker’s opinion in the district court, and it relies very heavily on Romer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:48 pm
” [Parker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
[W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
In 1962, the Supreme Court decided in Baker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Baker (2008), the high court reiterated that its declaration in State Farm v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:25 pm
” Baker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The quintessential examples for Ely were the decisions in Baker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Goldstein tried nonetheless (as the alternative would have been to just concede the case away, though that would have been warranted) to defend the retroactive approach, and pointed to Baker v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Here, it refers to its 1999 opinion in People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
