Search for: "Bays v. Bays"
Results 541 - 560
of 5,328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2021, 6:04 pm
Justice Myers’ other recent decision in 713949 Ontario Limited v Hudson’s Bay Company ULC, where he granted an adjournment, provides further context to these difficulties, [16] The court takes very seriously issues of health and wellness of practitioners, members of the judiciary, and court staff during the pandemic in particular. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 12:15 pm
| No likelihood of confusion between EU collective trade mark ‘HALLOUMI’ and ‘BBQLOUMI’, says EU General CourtNever Too Late 301 [Week ending January 31]: The 'goldfish phone booth' copyright case in Japan | Canadian Federal Court considers whether Teva's COPAXONE second medical use patents were obvious-to-try (Teva v Pharmascience) | [Guest Post] The Nigerian Companies And Allied Matters Act 2020 and the protection of trademarks against similar… [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:20 am
A Ruling on the Impact of Covid-19 on Notice Periods In late January, the Ontario Superior Court released a decision, Yee v Hudson’s Bay Company, 2021 ONSC 387, following a virtual trial, of Melvin Yee, a 62-year-old terminated from Hudson’s Bay Company. [read post]
A federal court just made it hecka-hard to prove age discrimination at work. But, did it go too far?
16 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court in Gross v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
UMNV 205-207 Newbury LLC (UrbanMeritage) v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:14 am
The case is SA Palm Beach LLC et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 10:30 am
Late last Friday night, the Supreme Court granted an application for an injunction in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:15 pm
Wilkof discussed the future of the San Francisco Bay Area, considering whether it might have lost the sheen which allowed it to attract and retain the best innovative talent, especially in the tech sector.In a guest post, Dr. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:38 am
Like this case.The case is South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
The ruling centers around two cases involving California churches South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
Supreme Court in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:32 am
” And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman has a post titled “SCOTUS Decides South Bay v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:31 am
Last night, a divided the Supreme Court enjoined the enforcement of California's prohibition on indoor worship services due to Covid-19 in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
[The Court is badly fractured, as Justice Barrett writes her first separate writing. ] Around 10:45 PM ET on Friday evening, the Supreme Court decided South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
[emphasis added].Wilson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am
The Second Circuit’s January 25, 2021 decision in Cavello Bay Reinsurance Ltd v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 3:31 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
The panel accordingly affirmed the entire judgment (Cavello Bay Reinsurance Ltd. v. [read post]
How Evidence of Your Accuser’s Biases May Greatly Strengthen Your Defense in a Florida Criminal Case
27 Jan 2021, 8:24 am
So, hypothetically, if V. [read post]
