Search for: "Brent v. Brent"
Results 541 - 560
of 771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
And then, on whether Waltham had implemented its own policy, the Court of Appeal found this situation was more akin to Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing (2022) EWCA Civ 979 (our note) than Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster (2018) EWCA Civ 2742, in that the issue was a lack of evience in following the policy, rather the terms of the policy itself. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
” At this blog Lyle discusses American Tradition Partnership. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Cohen relies upon that rule and on Levine v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:07 am
As the Superior Court of Pennsylvania noted in Kukowski v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
Ms W-H contention that temporary accommodation could have been offered was contrary to the decisions in Alibkhiet v Brent London Borough Council (2018) EWCA Civ 2742 and Broderick v Bromley London Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1522 (our note) that when to make a decision was a matter for the local authority and that “the shortage of housing … is the constant backcloth against which all housing decisions are currently made”, the Council did not need to… [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
In Cojocaru v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
11 May 2025, 12:52 pm
Muse v Brent LBC (2008) EWCA Civ 1447 The manner in which the housing duty could be satisfied changes with changing conditions. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
The appeal targets a West Virginia Supreme Court justice, Brent D. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
Klein Independent School District (here), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard a case where: "Brent E. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm
McDonough and Thornton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am
On 8 April 2025, the ECtHR handed down judgement in the case of Green v The United Kingdom (Application no. 22077/19). [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
In Sessions v. [read post]
