Search for: "CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT V US"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Of that amount, nearly $10 million was used to acquire land for a new site for the Episcopal Archives in Austin, Texas, and the balance was used for improvements at 815 Second Avenue -- a good part of which has now been rented out to third-party tenants.The Church has bought raw land when it does not yet possess the additional money required to construct a building on it, and the raw land itself is not financeable -- that is, since it is non-revenue producing, it cannot be… [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Massachusetts and Zucht v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:16 am
Stanford unsuccessfully invoked California's rules on non-compete clauses,Cal. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Preferences or other incentives could be given for “products manufactured using processes that minimize greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am
A subsequent outbreak in California in 1985 confirmed the role of food in disseminating listeriosis. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
.' This is the ninth in the ongoing series of posts compiling the most recent publicly available developments surrounding the litigation Commonly Known As Rakofsky v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
ESG rule developments relevant to the asset management industry: On May 25, 2022, the SEC proposed amendments to rules and reporting forms relating to the incorporation of ESG factors by registered investment companies and business development companies (collectively, “funds”) and advisers. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
By using the agency theory discussed in Judge Reinhardt’s decision, we hold the corporation to a much higher standard that would require greater transparency in their business relationships and greater scrutiny of its business decisions in areas associated with political turmoil and human rights violations. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
This post takes up the questions of how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their use of other people's data, generally without prior notice or permission. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/bGMN6YpnxR -> Google Can Derive Undisclosed Economic Benefits From CAPTCHAs–Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The expansion of California’s hydroelectric capacity bolsters new construction of key infrastructure relevant to land use development. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:06 am
For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, LLP at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:18 am
Geffner v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
” The delegates recommended the use of tools and governance practices to address these fundamental concerns. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
This footnote strikes us as frankly bizarre. [read post]
