Search for: "Carroll v. Carroll" Results 541 - 560 of 1,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Federal Courts - Moderator - Christine Farley, American University Washington College of Law Jessica Silbey, Suffolk University Law School - Intellectual Property Reform Through the Lens of Constitutional Equality Sandra Park, ACLU Women's Rights Project - A Feminist Challenge to Gene Patents: Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The property owners prevailed in the Third Circuit, but the Supreme Court reverses and grants the police officers qualified immunity.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:23 am
For example, the Supreme Court of Arizona said last April in the case of State ex rel Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
For example, the Supreme Court of Arizona said last April in the case of State ex rel Montgomery v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:14 pm by Richard M. Re
I've been posting on recent qualified immunity cases, including the summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
    Briefly: Richard Re of Re’s Judicata has the second part of his discussion of the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]