Search for: "Case Construction Equipment, Inc." Results 541 - 560 of 1,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm by Scott A. McKeown
The holding in Fresenius II was a bit more controversial that In re Baxter (given recent cases like In re Construction Equipment). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:12 am by Gene Killian
  Recently, the Eleventh Circuit had a lot to say on that subject, in a (somewhat convoluted) case captioned Wellons Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
If Apple wants a FRAND determination in that district, a far more constructive alternative to a motion to dismiss would have been to counterclaim in the action Ericsson had already brought. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
Just last week a Denver construction company, H&E Equipment Services, Inc., agreed to pay $125,000 to settle a sex discrimination suit filed by one of its former female employees. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:08 pm by Ben Vernia
  Shire Pharmaceuticals LLC paid $350 million to resolve allegations that Shire and the company it acquired in 2011, Advanced BioHealing (ABH), induced clinics and physicians to use or overuse its bioengineered human skin substitute by offering lavish dinners, drinks, entertainment and travel; medical equipment and supplies; unwarranted payments for purported speaking engagements and bogus case studies; and cash, credits and rebates. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:20 am by Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield
In another case, Jason represented a construction worker that was severely injured when his heavy equipment overturned while unloading it from a flatbed tractor trailer. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:02 pm by Roy Costa, RS, MS (MBA)
., a registered professional sanitarian and founder/owner of Environ Health Associates Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:25 am by Sean Wajert
At the time of his accident, Spears was employed as the shop foreman for Apeck Construction, Inc., and was the head mechanic in charge of servicing and repairing equipment used by Apeck in its business. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm by Ron Miller
The court ruled that the courier was not required to alleged facts related to “what hourly wage [she] was paid, an estimate of how many hours [she] worked for which she was not compensated, and whether the employer had actual or constructive knowledge of the alleged uncompensated overtime. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm by Eric Schweibenz
As to related litigation, Bosch states that the asserted patents have been involved in two district court cases in the District of Delaware, eight district court cases in the District of Nevada, one district court case in the Eastern District of Michigan, and two district court cases in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
  Patentees may therefore want to consider crafting claims covering the end user equipment where possible to avoid this problem in the future. [read post]