Search for: "Cost v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 31,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law,  has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
"The judgement does not state whether the applicant prayed for imposition of costs on the sole arbitrator. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:07 am
Among those, it was stated that the additional costs incurred directly by the provision of access to the satellite signal were zero in this case. [read post]