Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 541 - 560 of 1,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:21 pm by Daily Record Staff
… In 2009, pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Cox pleaded guilty to seconddegree assault and to a fourth-degree sexual offense. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, the court determined that a background check requirement, distribution of work orders, and customer satisfaction surveys reflected no more than a legitimate contractor relationship between the cable company and the contractor it hired to provide installation and maintenance services (Crosby v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:16 pm by Mitch Stoltz
As EFF and Public Knowledge told the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the BMG v. [read post]