Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:36 am
” Cox v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am
Background of the Transgender Discrimination Case The case, EEOC v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am
Background of the Transgender Discrimination Case The case, EEOC v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am
Background of the Transgender Discrimination Case The case, EEOC v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:45 pm
Cox, ___ N.C. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 7:01 am
" City of Des Plaines v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:21 pm
… In 2009, pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Cox pleaded guilty to seconddegree assault and to a fourth-degree sexual offense. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:20 am
Here, the court determined that a background check requirement, distribution of work orders, and customer satisfaction surveys reflected no more than a legitimate contractor relationship between the cable company and the contractor it hired to provide installation and maintenance services (Crosby v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:07 pm
LSU v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:07 pm
LSU v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:07 pm
LSU v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:16 pm
As EFF and Public Knowledge told the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the BMG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Cox, [2000] A.J. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:39 pm
Stephen Cox, Atty. [read post]