Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
ARCAP Rule 9(c) states: A notice of appeal or cross-appeal filed after the superior court announces an order or other form of decision – but before entry of the resulting judgment that will be appealable – is treated as filed on the date of, and after the entry of, the judgment. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
ARCAP Rule 9(c) states: A notice of appeal or cross-appeal filed after the superior court announces an order or other form of decision – but before entry of the resulting judgment that will be appealable – is treated as filed on the date of, and after the entry of, the judgment. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
Groom, 353 N.C. 50, 84–86 (2000); see also Jessica Smith, Absolute Impasse, North Carolina Superior Court Judges’ Benchbook (Nov. 2011). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
Groom, 353 N.C. 50, 84–86 (2000); see also Jessica Smith, Absolute Impasse, North Carolina Superior Court Judges’ Benchbook (Nov. 2011). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 10:08 am
The Superior Court panel opinion pointed to Yocabet v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire: Petition of State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Judge Nealon also noted that the only relevant appellate precedent issued by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Deeds v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:45 pm
A California employer was faced with just that experience in Pierson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
He cites U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
Holder and Lusardi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued two decisions – Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:49 pm
May 19, 2016) (TRANSCRIPT) and Green v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Suffolk County cross-moved to permanently stay the arbitration proceeding contending [1] that no valid agreement to arbitrate the MOA had been made and [2] that the wage deferral provisions of the MOA were invalid because they called for an additional appropriation of funds that had not been approved by the County Legislature.* The Suffolk County Superior Officers Association [SOA] and PBA joined in the motions to stay the arbitration and to dismiss DSPBA’s complaint.Supreme… [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:02 pm
Wells Fargo Bank & Company, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles; the case is No. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Mintz cross-appeals from the sanctions award.Roberts v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
In the case of Coughlin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:07 pm
Superior Court (Anderson), S221038. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:39 am
As a result, the court denied a motion to remand the action that alleged MoneyGram made materially false statements in a prospectus supplement associated with an offering of the company’s stock (Iron Workers District Council v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:41 am
There was a need for cross-examination. [read post]
