Search for: "DEAS V. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 2:24 am
Reel-to-reel.JPG Seventh Circuit finds admission of DEA agent's post-indictment identification of drug conspiracy defendant did not violate the defendant's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights, despite the suggestiveness that might result from his knowing he was expected to identify the defendant's voice on the tape, because it was none-the-less reliable "under the totality of circumstances" since it was based on six hours of the agent's study… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Horn v Huddle centers around claims (.pdf) by Richard Horn, formerly a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Administration, that employees for the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency planted listening devices in his home in 1992, while he was stationed in Burma (now Myanmar). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:32 pm
United States, 267 U.S. 132. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:27 pm
In 62 BC she posted the festival of the Bona Dea ("good goddess"), to which no man was permitted to attend. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:59 am
Co., 17 AD3d 444; Vacca v State Farm Ins. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
In the United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
It's all about whether you can remove appeals of state administrative decisions. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:08 am
While the uncorroborated testimony of co-conspirators can be sufficient to support a conviction, see United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:29 pm
” Id. at 275 (quoting Perez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:06 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:15 am
Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525, holds that the "appointment of [an] individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V Section 6 of the Constitution. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:28 am
., writes: The judicial deconstruction of police encounters with defendants has produced a notable decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 7:55 am
In Olsen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
