Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 3:04 am
Lynn blogged last week that the SEC’s amendments to modernize Items 101, 103 and 105 of Regulation S-K have now been published in the Federal Register. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am
Eastern time on Friday, November 6th must comply with the amendments to Items 101, 103 and 105, to the extent applicable. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:44 am
“I must be stupid to think the truth is important when everyone around me does not,” Whitehurst commented. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Since Regulation S-K does not apply to foreign private issuers unless a form reserved for foreign private issuers (e.g., Form F-1, F-3 or F-4) specifically refers to Regulation S-K, the amendments to Items 101 and 103 apply only to domestic registrants and foreign private issuers that have elected to file on domestic forms. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
§ 103 in its interpretation of Section 409(2). [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
Key Findings At the end of 2025, most individual income tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) will expire, increasing taxes on individuals. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
It was reintroduced in 2019 with bipartisan support, and, in September 2020, passed by a bipartisan vote of 226-103. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J) (Denham CJ, Clarke,… [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:18 pm
In 2010, the SEC issued guidance stating that issuers should include a discussion of climate risk in items 101 and 103, two of the provisions that were amend, to the extent it is material. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
It does so in three respects. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:16 am
He discusses the cases where a plaintiff invokes rules of substantive law in his submission of action and where he or she does not – according to the AG, in the latter scenario, his method does not change fundamentally. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 11:26 pm
On September 11, 2020, the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:23 am
Image by RockMotorArt from PixabayOn August 26, 2020, the SEC continued to keep its foot on the gas with respect to its recent practice of modernizing disclosure rules by adopting amendments to the description of business (Item 101), legal proceedings (Item 103), and risk factor disclosures (Item 105) that registrants are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:06 pm
About Salmonella infectionsFood contaminated with Salmonella bacteria does not usually look, smell, or taste spoiled. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Indeed, the legal standards we learn about traditionally “are nothing more than structured preferences” (at 103), while critical theory interrogates the principles by which those preferences are chosen and explored (at 109). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 11:00 am
Id.Most recently, the SAFE Banking Act passed the House of Representatives on a vote of 321-103 on September 25th, 2019. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:03 am
Yesterday at an open meeting, the SEC adopted amendments to parts of Regulation S-K – specifically relating to Item 101 (business description), Item 103 (legal proceedings) & Item 105 (risk factors). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 7:32 am
The way one used words does not merely describe a thing but it also injects value (and the judgment of principle) into the words used. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
The Court dismissed this contention, noting that Connecticut's right of publicity does not explicitly involve a commercial use element; even if it did, the Second Circuit does not consider a commercial use element to create a meaningfully distinct claim from a claim for wrongful copying. [read post]
