Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services" Results 541 - 560 of 1,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The question was whether the Department of Health and Human Services was permitted to change, without notice and comment, an important reimbursement formula for hospitals that treat many low-income patients. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(American Express is a notable exception in that regard, as is, to some extent, Bank of America f/k/a FIA Card Services, N.A.). [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm by Patricia Hughes
In Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am by SHG
Absent mandatory language in the regs, or court decisions like Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:20 am by Christopher Wilkinson
Department of Health and Human Services did in late 2018), a Supreme Court ruling that “because of sex” includes sexual orientation and/or gender identity could impact federal agencies in many other areas. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18 and April 26 conferences)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
So instead, let me say a little bit about one case the court has repeatedly rescheduled and that has garnered some attention: Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health, Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
In February 2017, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition against the mother alleging that she derivatively neglected the child. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Benjamin Barsky
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—the agencies charged with the regulations’ enforcement—could place Americans under involuntary quarantine, write Ulrich and Mariner. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:33 am by Mark Fenster
Department of Health & Human Services (which only Justice Antonin Scalia joined). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
And on March 6, Huawei and its U.S. subsidiary sued the U.S. government and the secretaries of labor, health and human services, education, agriculture, veterans affairs, and the interior, as well as the administrator of the General Services Administration. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after March 22 conference; apparently relisted after the March 29 conference)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Kellie McTammany
” </p> </div> <div style="padding-top:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:35px;" data-rss-type="text"> <p style="margin:0px;"> The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also issued a statement that the court’s ruling was “not an injunction that halts the enforcement of the law and not a final judgment” and said… [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Outside of developments in post-secondary education law since, this rationale does not necessarily extend to claims of bullying or harassment where indicia of human rights are not present, or where it falls outside of the scope of the Human Rights Code. [read post]