Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
"The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Lynch and Sullivan) reverses and reinstates the verdict. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
The plaintiffs’ lawyers in Keepseagle v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 291 (quoting City of Chicago v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
Sullivan, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Anderson, 55 M.J. 182 (C.A.A.F. 2001)(Sullivan, J., concurring). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
The case is Moll v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
And since RFRA contains an express right of action with an express provision for "appropriate relief," the initial three-judge panel faithfully applied that statute in holding the plaintiffs could sue the federal government for damages over the religiously-motivated no-fly determination.Writing for the pro-en banc judges, Judge Jacobs (joined by Judges Cabranes and Sullivan) writes that a comparable religious discrimination statute, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
Seeking relief from judgment from a tribunal other than the one that handed down the judgmentCherry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 6:49 am
That case is Gallagher v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck tackled Senator Kaine’s letter to the Pentagon on collective self-defense, recent updates in Doe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:01 am
In 1963, the Court held in Bantam Books v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Cummings v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:19 pm
Sullivan, Los Angeles Superior Court / BC614012). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:39 am
What does it mean to "reasonably accommodate"? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:04 am
In the Supreme Court’s Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
And if there is such a measure, does Yout.com circumvent it? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
One phrase that came up several times at Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
Sullivan, 451 F.3d 884 (U.S. [read post]
