Search for: "Does, 1-13" Results 541 - 560 of 21,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Referring to point 1.4 of the Reasons for opinion G 1/92 and decision T 23/11 of 13 February 2014, the patent proprietor submitted that the disclosure of said example was not enabling, since D1 did not disclose the polymerisation process resulting in ENGAGE® 8400. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although theBoard decision does not directly state that it consideredthe evidence relating to claim 9, that evidence is almostidentical to the evidence that HP presented with respectto claim 13. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
On January 1, 2016 Tennessee, the first state to adopt an animal abuse registry, went live with it registry. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:25 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Main request: Articles 100(a) and 54 EPCThe appellants contested novelty in view of D5 but, for the following reasons, the board does not share this view:3.1 D5 discloses a filter medium comprising a web with a fiber layer and spacer particles (claim 1).A "support layer" is required by claim 1 of the patent in suit, whereas D5 discloses the possibility of a stacked arrangement of layers with the same or different compositions (page 13 lines 22 to 27). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
Peirce and Roisman also noted that a Section 13(b)(2)(B) violation does not require a showing of scienter, while a violation of Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 would require such showing.Peirce and Roisman also observed that the Andeavor matter presented several "complications. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by or
Thus, a literal interpretation of Article 13(1) RPBA should be avoided in the present case.Additionally, the appellant-patentee itself cited page 11 of the parent application as filed as the basis for claim 6 of the main request. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
In a letter of demand dated 13 July 2011, Hard Drive sought to settle the matter with Ms Wong for US$3,400. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Unknown
Covering Central American Migration at a Crossroads, 11 Feb. 2021 [access] - Note: The recording does not cover the entire discussion. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:49 pm
 The questions posed by the referring court are as follows: 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 3:03 pm by Victoria Ring
  Today, Clay earns more money with his VBA business than he does his full time job and he is in the transition of going full-time and permanently leave his employer. * Includes question and answer session 11:45 to 1:00 – Lunch 1:00 to 1:45 – Speaker: Pamela Starr * Just like Victoria Ring is the developer of the VBA industry specializing in DEBTOR law, Pamela Starr is the developer of the VBA industry specializing in CREDITOR law. [read post]