Search for: "Does I through IX"
Results 541 - 560
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
” Sex discrimination, says the DOE, includes sexual violence. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:52 am
Specifically, it would add to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act a new Title IX outlining broad limitations on the act’s application to U.S. persons. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
But does it have any teeth, really? [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:59 am
( Thomas Jefferson Center) The Thomas Jefferson Center (with which I’m involved as a member of the board of trustees) has just released its yearly Jefferson Muzzles, so I thought I’d pass along the center’s explanation of who the “winners” are this year. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
I. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX)” n.16, App 4, p.1846. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
He advanced his nationalist vision through rewriting the Preamble. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
I am doing so here and now in this blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
And the question is always, does Congress want half a loaf. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
About half of those had some type of child support agreement in place, and nearly 90% were established through Title IV-D. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Referring to the judgment in the case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC] (no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005‑IX) the applicant requested that he should nevertheless be allowed to cast his vote in the July 2007 elections. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Referring to the judgment in the case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC] (no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005‑IX) the applicant requested that he should nevertheless be allowed to cast his vote in the July 2007 elections. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Referring to the judgment in the case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC] (no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005‑IX) the applicant requested that he should nevertheless be allowed to cast his vote in the July 2007 elections. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am
The final requests of the parties were as follows:The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the European patent be revoked.The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed (main request), alternatively that the patent be maintained in amended form according to one of auxiliary requests 1 to 7, filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal dated 20 July 2016.IX. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:20 pm
Judge Richard Story joined the majority opinion, but added: I concur in the opinion of the Court but write separately to make clear that the opinion does not prohibit a university from establishing a program that provides students an opportunity to engage in civil discussions concerning differing viewpoints. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
The JOBS Act established the emerginggrowth companycategory in Title I. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
Book Contract Checklist I. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am
IX. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
In a series of posts on Balkinization, I have tried to untangle many of these and other mischaracterizations and misunderstandings. [read post]
