Search for: "Downing v. Department of Health and Human Services" Results 541 - 560 of 790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, et. al.) has struck down a key portion of DOMA, saying that for the federal government to deny legally married, same-sex couples health benefits is unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Cathryn Hopkins, Olswang
The US Supreme Court is expected to hand down its judgment in the high profile, heavily debated case of Florida v Department of Health and Human Services before its 2012 term draws to a close at the end of June. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204  (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:01 pm by Caitlin Padula
To apply for the Medicaid spenddown program, contact your local Department of Human Services (DHS). [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
Health and Human Services Department (Circuit docket 10-2204), the Circuit Court took a cautious approach that it said was based on recent Supreme Court precedents outlawing discrimination against minorities.The ruling nullified Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, passed by Congress in 1996 to deny any federal benefit to a same-sex couple, even if the spouses were legally married under state law. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
” In other words, Congress cannot regulate how an individual pays for health care until he or she actually enters the market and purchases medical services. [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:07 pm by David Hart QC
Last week Rosalind English did a summary post on the important Supreme Court case of Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 - read judgement. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
United States Department of Health and Human Services & Kathleen Sebelius, here. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  Here is a somewhat dispiriting exchange between Congressman Trey Gowdy and Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius about the constitutionality of what is known about town as “the HHS Mandate,” a set of regulations which would, as presently constituted, require many employers who provide health insurance to their employees to include contraceptive and abortifacient products as part of their plans. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm by Sam Murrant
It is notably watered down compared to the radical early drafts, but still contains much of substance. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Department of Health v IC, Healey and Cecil(EA/2011/0286 & EA/2011/0287) - Read Decision In a recent post, Panopticon brought you, hot-off-the-press, the Tribunal’s decision in the much-publicised case involving publication, under Freedom of Information Law, of the NHS Risk Register. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
The Court was hearing oral arguments on an appeal by the Physicians Hospitals of America and Texas Spine & Joint Hospital, Lts, for the dismissal of an action they had filed for declaratory and injunctive relief against Kathleen Sebelius, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to prevent enforcement of Section 6001 of the ACA. [read post]