Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:48 pm
Citing General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
”11 Rothman suggests that the term “statistical significance” could be eliminated from scientific discussions without loss of meaning, and this linguistic legerdemain shows that the phrase is unimportant in science and in law.12 Rothman’s suggestion, however, ignores that causal assessments have always required an evaluation of the play of chance, especially for putative causes, which are neither necessary nor sufficient, and which modify underlying stochastic… [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In its 2008 landmark decision Edwards v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:45 am
In its discussion of Moyes, the Court challenged the Moyes court’s “reasonableness” and slight affect approach to employee non-solicitation provisions and contrasted it with the plain language of 16600 and subsequent case law in the California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall famously wrote in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
(That's from Edwards v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:46 am
Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Common law jurists like Sir Edward Coke had claimed that the English constitution was fixed. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
"From TM v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
In the 1919 case McKinley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Even Lord Edward Coke rejected such overtures from King James I. . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
Edward T. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Access to Justice (A2J): for our work as lawyers, we don’t know enough about the technology that produces much of the evidence we have to deal with. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
It was the first ruling against Britain’s mass-surveillance programs since Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelations. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:17 pm
In the famous popular 1st year law student case—colloquially known as the Ghostbusters case—Stambovsky, v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
Rosie asks what this may mean in practice: Time for a break - catching up with KitKat. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 pm
The case, Knick v. [read post]
