Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 4:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:38 am
Related PostsJuly 12, 2010 -- Calt on A, B & C v Ireland (1)December 9, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
LoGiudice v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
Syed v Malik [2023] NZHC 1676. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN’s planned publication in England will be a further unwelcome intrusion into the private lives of PJS and his family. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:16 am
Brewer v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:10 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm
Democratic Press SA [2017]EWCA Civ 1194 and ABC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In Girouard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
Wang v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
So here we go:* Playing by the Rules: or a tale of Fault and Default in infringement proceedingsJeremy reports on Ahmet Erol v Global Fashion Links Ltd, a trade mark decision from Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales that addresses the topic of when it is appropriate to set aside default judgments -- which a court issues when one of the parties to a dispute fails to enter the litigation and the other side wins by a walk-over.*… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Verizon New England Inc., No. 09-1214, 2010 WL 431873, at *5 (1st Cir. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In support of its argument the Defendant referred to the recent decision in R (on the application of Coke-Wallis) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales [2011] UKSC 1, where the Supreme Court unanimously held that the principle of res judicata applied to “non-statutory disciplinary proceedings” in certain circumstances. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation (Winrow v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
