Search for: "Ex Parte State" Results 541 - 560 of 11,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Last Friday, the BPAI issued a decision reversing all rejections in the ex parte reexamination appeal of U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Keith Maynard
If your ex is considering moving to another state with your child – or if you have custody and are considering a move – a Florida family law attorney can help you understand the legal aspects of child relocation and your rights as a parent. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:34 pm
In 1980, Congress established “ex parte reexamination,” which still exists today. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 am
"Naturally, state lawmakers took action to address the issue. [read post]
6 Jan 2005, 6:06 am
The agreement is part of a settlement reached Wednesday with plaintiffs led by the New York State Common Retirement Fund who lost billions in the accounting fraud scandal that hit the company in 2002. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:14 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Congress created the three-judge district court in 1910; the procedure directly responded to the Supreme Court’s decision in Ex Parte Young, which allowed a federal district court, presided over by a single judge, to enjoin enforcement of an unconstitutional state law. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The issuance of an opinion certainly is part of an official proceeding, and, depending on the evidence, it is foreseeable that a law clerk could seek to corruptly (that is, wrongly, as in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 3:38 am
It may be overcome in three instances: (1) the state consents to suit; (2) Congress expressly abrogates the states' immunity; or (3) the citizen sues a state official pursuant to Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:44 am
"It would be a shame if these examples were part of a conservative rewriting of constitutional history. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within Ex parte Doshi there is a dissent related to "grounds of rejection": At the time that the Appeal Brief was filed, our rules required Appellant to provide “[a] concise statement of each ground of rejection presented for review. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:06 am
[it is not clear that the appellants argued against this point.]See the opinion in Ex parte Yamaguchi. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
Va. 2014)) that, in a Section 1071(b) civil action for review of an ex parte TTAB decision, the plaintiff/applicant must pay the PTO's expenses (including attorney and paralegal fees). [read post]