Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 18,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 7:54 pm
Auto Club Ass'n of America, ____ Mich App _____ (2011) has stated that conservatorship fees incurred for managing an accident victims affairs is an allowable expense under the Michigan no-fault system. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of General Counsel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
In most states, people convicted of crimes pay fines, restitution, court costs and other fees. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:55 am
In Studler v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:41 pm
The case is Fox v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 2:15 pm
The recent, pithy decision of Tulum Management USA LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Tina G Yin-Sowatzke Oral arguments commenced on October 7, 2019 in Peter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
” Gartenberg v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:24 am
Johnson (Florida State): On July 16, the D.C. district court decided Ridgely v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:26 pm
§607-14 and stated that case law, the broad language of Haw. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:07 am
., SR. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:23 am
Larue v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:11 pm
Today's post is shared from insurancejournal.com/The Florida Supreme Court is considering whether to declare the state’s workers’ compensation attorney fee schedule unconstitutional.The court recently heard oral arguments in a case (Castellanos v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 6:05 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 , holding that requiring nonmembers of public-sector unions to pay fees to cover collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:06 pm
China Grove 152, LLC v Town of China Grove, 773 S.E. 2d 566 (NC App. 7/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nc-court-of-appeals/1707053.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Impact Fees Tagged: adequate public facilities ordinance, impact fee [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am
In Edelman v Poster ; 2010 NY Slip Op 00788 ; Decided on February 4, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department we see a situation in which a matrimonial retainer agreement boldly stated a right to arbitrate, yet the Appellate Division, First Department, determined that client has no right to arbitrate. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:07 pm
” They told him the fee was double, and when he declined, the “bouncer” insisted on an “appearance fee”. [read post]
