Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Read Judge Scheindlin's opinion in the Stop and Frisk case, Floyd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 3:36 pm
Scheindlin, (Floyd v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Baselines for Terry Stops In Floyd v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Foreword: Buckley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am
Canestraro’s petition failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:47 pm
Courageous educator Gilda Day files her appeal to the State Board of Education as reported in the Rome News Tribune: Brief of Appellant Gilda Day v Floyd County Board of Education Final (1) Williams Oinonen LLC represents educators all over Georgia. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Vringo also cited the dicta of Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in IPCom v Nokia [2009] EWHC 1017 where, when asked to order a trial of a preliminary issue to determine the FRAND licence terms in relation to IPCom's patent in suit, he stated that: "...What is at stake between parties in portfolio patent litigation of this kind is usually the sum of money which will enable the grant of a worldwide licence under the entire portfolio. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
The English courts have referred to this mechanism both in the High Court (Floyd J's dicta in Nokia v IPCom) and Birss J when he was sitting in the Patents County Court in relation to copyright cases: "In cases like this the preliminary issue being decided is on a tangible basis. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:51 am
In Newby v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:31 am
Municipalities intending to promulgate or amend civil service personnel rules must comply with the provisions of Civil Service Law §20 Floyd v City of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 03772, Appellate Division, First Department Under color of New York City Mayoral Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2, the City issued rules allocating certain “ungraded” civil service titles otherwise subject to prevailing wage bargaining under Labor Law §220 to positions… [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 am
The Court had previously held that such an exception continued to apply in cases of forfeitures in state court, but AEDPA had not altered federal habeas treatment of state defaults. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:06 pm
It is now the subject of a class action lawsuit in Floyd v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Welcome, Floyd. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
In a Q&A document accompanying its Monday announcement of a Statement of Objections (SO) against Google's Motorola's pursuit of injunctions against Apple (and creation of an agreement under allegedly-abusive circumstances) the European Commission stated in no uncertain terms its disagreement with some of the terms certain German courts have in recent years imposed on implementers of FRAND standards if they wanted to avoid sales bans under the Orange-Book-Standard framework. [read post]
