Search for: "Forms, Inc., v. American Standard, Inc" Results 541 - 560 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
While established journalistic standards provide a useful guide by which to evaluate the conduct of journalists and non-journalists alike, the applicable standards will necessarily evolve to keep pace with the norms of new communications media. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
As of 2014, 71% of online American adults used Facebook, which amounted to 189 million monthly users. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Kornreich’s ruling in Matter of Belardi-Ostroy, Ltd. v American List Counsel, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 30727(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 14, 2016], denied injunctive relief and dismissed a dissolution petition which asked her effectively to override an order issued last December by a New Jersey judge appointing a fifth Board member to fill a vacancy on the LLC’s otherwise deadlocked five-member Board of Directors. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Kornreich’s ruling in Matter of Belardi-Ostroy, Ltd. v American List Counsel, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 30727(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 14, 2016], denied injunctive relief and dismissed a dissolution petition which asked her effectively to override an order issued last December by a New Jersey judge appointing a fifth Board member to fill a vacancy on the LLC’s otherwise deadlocked five-member Board of Directors. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Kornreich’s ruling in Matter of Belardi-Ostroy, Ltd. v American List Counsel, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 30727(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 14, 2016], denied injunctive relief and dismissed a dissolution petition which asked her effectively to override an order issued last December by a New Jersey judge appointing a fifth Board member to fill a vacancy on the LLC’s otherwise deadlocked five-member Board of Directors. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Cyber Insurance Does not Cover Hacking into Vendor’s Computer System   In Kraft Chemical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Last year, the American Bar Association reported in its annual Legal Technology Survey that one in four firms with at least 100 attorneys have experienced data breaches involving hackers, website attacks or stolen or lost smartphones, tablets or laptop computers. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
On Tuesday, the latest decision from Mr Justice Arnold in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 was handed down. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:55 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Dennis Clifford and Rachel Hoffer From December 2011 to September 2012, Ambrea Fairchild was living the new All American dream: hired by All American Check Cashing, Inc. as an hourly manager trainee in its Hattiesburg, Mississippi store, Fairchild was soon promoted to manager, a salaried position, in March 2012. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Anderson v.Cryovac, Inc., 862 F.2d 910, 923 (1st Cir. 1988) (emphasisadded); see also Bros Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Turning to the losers, the Court denied cert. to two-time relist American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm by Jason M. Halper
Background Halt Medical was formed to develop procedures and technologies for the treatment of fibroid tumors in women, and according to the plaintiffs, it is “well-positioned to become the standard of care for women in the treatment of fibroid tumors. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
When Vermont sought to require the Plan’s third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government sought the order ex parte, which means Apple did not have any opportunity to present any form of opposition to the judge. [read post]