Search for: "GMBH" Results 541 - 560 of 2,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2020, 4:45 am by Sophie Corke
- this time, relating to two sets of proceedings in a dispute with Lenovo.Trade MarksIPKat Eleonora Rosati considered the implications of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Constantin Film, C-240/18 P, aka Fack Ju Göhte, in relation to freedom of expression, trade marks, and copyright law.Keeping with the CJEU theme, GuestKat Riana Harvey commented on the decision in Joined Cases C-155/18 P to C-158/18 P, which brought the lengthy dispute between… [read post]
Following the success of the German comedy film FACK JU GÖHTE, the appellant, Constantin Film Production GmbH, filed for the word mark FACK JU GÖHTE in several classes including class 9 for recorded media and class 41 for film entertainment. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Dan Gold, Thad Behrens, Kit Adelman, and Emily Westridge Black of the Haynes and Boone, LLP law firm review the key developments during 2019 in securities litigation and enforcement, including significant securities related decisions by the Supreme Court and federal appellate courts, key developments in SEC enforcement, and significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am by Susanna Villani (University of Bologna)
In line with this orientation, the EU does not recognise Israel’s sovereignty over the territories occupied and, as already recalled in the Brita case (ECJ, Brita Gmbh vs. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
Last week marked the end of a lengthy battle between Tulliallan Burlington (‘Tulliallan’), proprietor of the high class shopping arcade in central London, ‘Burlington Arcade’, and German Fashion GmbH (‘BF’). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 4:08 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
In its ruling of  28 January 2020 (2020) EWHC 132 (Pat) (read here), Justice Douglas Campbell QC of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales  ruled in favor of the crown use defence in a  case of alleged infringement of patent EP (UK) 2,579,666 B1, entitled “Allocation of access rights for a telecommunications channel to subscriber stations of telecommunications network,” filed by IPCom GMBH against Vodafone Group PLC. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-34 (TTAB 1995), the Board stated that “factors” to be considered in determining whether a term is primarily merely a surname include (1) the degree of a surname’s rareness; (2) whether anyone connected with the applicant has that surname; (3) whether the term has any recognized meaning other than that of a surname; (4) whether the term has the “structure and pronunciation” of a surname; and (5) whether the stylization of lettering is… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
So no surprise that when Red Bull found another energy drink manufacturer selling its wares under the BIGHORN trade mark using signs that bore a certain similarity to Red Bull logos - in one of the three instances pleaded, charging rams rather than charging bulls - they sued for trade mark infringement on grounds of likelihood of confusion (the rams obviously meaning that the defendant's trade mark could not be identical) and unfair advantage (without due cause, of course).The deputy judge,… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
So no surprise that when Red Bull found another energy drink manufacturer selling its wares under the BIGHORN trade mark using signs that bore a certain similarity to Red Bull logos - in one of the three instances pleaded, charging rams rather than charging bulls - they sued for trade mark infringement on grounds of likelihood of confusion (the rams obviously meaning that the defendant's trade mark could not be identical) and unfair advantage (without due cause, of course).The deputy judge,… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Toth.Non-party, AHMR GmbH (“AHMR”), an Austrian limited company, was formed solely for the purpose of holding all of the equity interest in Allomet and Yanchep, Allomet’s intellectual property, and Yanchep’s assets. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:56 pm
However, its reliance on identifying similarities with existing popular music could prove to be problematic from a copyright perspective.Clarence Lakpini was in attendance at the launch of GuestKat Chijioke Okorie's new book on 'Multi-Sided Music Platforms and the Law', summarising a number of issues and talking points which arose at the event here.Trade MarksThe IPKat commented on two trade mark judgments, with GuestKat Riana Harvey reporting on the High Court of England… [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
That prompted O’Gara’s September 28, 2018 Chancery Court complaint that at one point, included four opposing directors, but in April 2019, he stipulated to dismiss directors Pedreiro, Evans and Adrian Leuenberger and his Swiss company, Lion Consulting Gmbh. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by News Desk
A team from the Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses are working with the German microbiology and food analysis laboratory Selektis GmbH as part of a ProFIT project running from 2018 to 2020. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
Delta Sport's logoThe General Court of the EU ('the Court') recently (13 February 2020) issued its judgment in Case T-387/18 Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since 1/1/2020, the revised  Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA2020) are in force. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 5:23 pm by Francis Pileggi
In May of that year, the parties drafted a Restructuring and Loan agreement to pave the way for the July 3 formation of AHMR GmbH, an Austrian holding company in which the Herrlings and Allomet pioneer Dr. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 3:26 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Kelyn Bacon QC) Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) (30 Jan 2020) This was a claim by Red Bull GmbH against Big Horn UK Ltd. and its sole director  Lyubomir Enchev. for infringement of the following European trade marks: EU003629342, EU000052746 and EU001564301  Red Bull complained that the defendants had distributed a [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:11 am
A: The current consortium consists of four partners: EURICE GmbH, the University of Alicante, TUM-Tech GmbH and the University of Navarra.EURICE provides support for participants in European framework programmes for research and innovation, while TUM-Tech administers access to university and research institution technologies. [read post]