Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 541 - 560 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Forgive my painting with a broad brush here, but there are two general approaches to the enforcement of employment antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
But in the late 1980s and in the 1990s, this began to change. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
The notoriety of the insanity defense demonstrates that most people in our society understand that in order to be held liable for a crime, in general one must be aware that an act is or was forbidden. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The claim was out of limitation and there was no reason as to why section 32A of the Limitation Act 1980 should apply. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice Kennedy, with the concurrence of all other Supreme Court members, wrote that the Information Age puts innovation in the hands of more people and raises new difficulties for the patent law (and the Patent Office) to determine who should or should not receive patent protection. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am by Henning Lahmann
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
The media can criticize the judiciary and make it a news item using the general anger of the people on the Justice Delivery Mechanism in this country. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:35 pm by Mark Moller
  The classic example is Pennoyer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
He was Solicitor General of the United States, 1985-89, and an Associate Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 1995-99. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]