Search for: "German v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 3,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by Neil Wilkof
Having lost at first instance, Birkenstock stated on appeal (before the Court of Appeal of the Hague) that the result in the Birkenstock v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am by Aziz Huq, Tom Ginsburg, David Landau
  In 1951, the West German government asked the Constitutional Court to ban both the Socialist Reich Party and the Communist Party. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:57 am by Emily Dai
” This Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Jan von Hein
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Sophie Britton (Bristows)
The German courts have taken a dislike to anti-suit injunctions, considering that it should be within their competence to decide whether a German patent is infringed in Germany, without interference from other courts. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The German courts have taken a dislike to anti-suit injunctions, considering that it should be within their competence to decide whether a German patent is infringed in Germany, without interference from other courts. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
The German courts have ruled that EPC 2000 claims correspond to purpose-limited product claims and can be directly infringed via an act in s.9(1) German Patents Act 1980. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
The German courts have ruled that EPC 2000 claims correspond to purpose-limited product claims and can be directly infringed via an act in s.9(1) German Patents Act 1980. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
The contract provided for resolution by the rules of the German Institution of Arbitration. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Similar to Abbott v Dexcom, the key reason for the present application was to avoid the German injunction gap (an issue explained in detail in Abbott v Dexcom, [33]). [read post]