Search for: "Griffith v. Griffith"
Results 541 - 560
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
Claire-Michelle Smyth B.A, LL.B, LL.M, PhD Candidate, Lecturer in Griffith College Dublin The Social Welfare Bill 2012 came into force in May 2012 and represents a turning point in Ireland’s discrimination of illegitimate children, and not for the better. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Also, s.97(2), CA 1989 makes it a criminal offence for anyone to publish any material which is likely to identify any child as being involved in proceedings in which any power under the Children Act 1989 or the Adoption and Children Act 2002 may be exercised with respect to that or any other child, or their address or school, unless the court has made an order disapplying the effect of s.97(2), as to which jurisdiction see Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882; [2022] EMLR 11. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 13-0639, asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule conflicts with the retroactivity rule established in Griffith v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:22 pm
Griffiths v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Griffith v State Farm, 472 Mich 521 (2005). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
Legal bloggers David Allen Green, Mike Semple Piggot (Charon QC) and Carl Gardner recorded the second edition of their excellent podcast, Without Prejudice, in which they discuss some of the week’s important legal news, joined by special guest Catrin Griffiths of The Lawyer. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am
” [See the complete article for more detail on]: “The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]“ “Less than a month after Larsen, the Delaware Supreme Court, in Griffith v Stein (___A3d ___ [Del Aug. 16, 2022]“ “Trump’s Lawyers May Become Witnesses or Targets in Documents Investigation” — “Two lawyers for former President Donald J. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
It was reheard by the Lord Chief Justice, Owen and Griffith Williams JJ and the appeal was allowed (Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] EWHC 2157 (Admin) (27 July 2012) (e) Which judge said “Your country needs you”? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
To be recoverable, a medical expense must be both incurred and reasonable.Howell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The stories were publishable because of a year-long battle to reveal the finding by freelance journalist Louise Tickle and Press Association’s Brian Farmer (backed by Tortoise Media) (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882). [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm
See Al-Bihani v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:03 am
Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Land, University of Connecticut School of Law Next Week in the Courts On 7 October 2019 there will be a trial in the case of Roundshield Partners LLP v Ciudad Real International Airport SL & ors before Mr Justice Griffiths. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Some courts have held in favor of an expert witness who has failed to provide helpful testimony to his or her client at trial, though not based on the doctrine of witness immunity.See Griffith v. [read post]
