Search for: "Health Plan Holdings, Inc." Results 541 - 560 of 1,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In particular, he discusses how the exceptions the Affordable Care Act creates for existing health plans to be “grandfathered”—and thus not required to provide contraceptive coverage—undermine the notion that the government’s interest is compelling. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:25 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Dineen graduated cum laude from Williams College with a B.A. in English and holds a Masters in City Planning from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:48 pm by Dan Flynn
R-CALF, represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a legal nonprofit, is trying to hold the line against an RFID mandate in U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Department of Labor also announced that it will hold a webinar for prospective applicants on Wednesday, June 24, 2015, at 1:00 p.m. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am by Law Lady
HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a Blake Medical Center; FRANCISCO ESPARZA, M.D.; DAVID DIVITA, M.D.; and PINNACLE MEDICAL GROUP, P.A., Appellees. 2nd District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Deficiency -- Action at law by mortgagee to recover damages for breach of note after mortgagee had included prayer for deficiency judgment in foreclosure complaint and trial court [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:10 am
  However, if such claims are based solely on allegations that the respective defendants violated the FDCA, then the claims are preempted.The case involves a group of seven health benefit plans accusing Amgen, Inc., DaVita, Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. of unlawfully promoting the off-label use of two drugs, Epogen and Aranesp (collectively, “EPO”), between 2002 and 2007. [read post]