Search for: "Holiday v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Ben shared 10 reasons to support Lawfare this holiday season. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Trump has stated that book contains an "insider's perspective" of "countless holiday meals," "family interactions," and "family events. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-1503, and Overton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:28 am by James Segroves
And following the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Azar v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
AUKUS: Biden’s New Security Agreement On Sept. 15, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced a new security agreement. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In addition, the United States seeks back pay, compensatory damages and reinstatement for Ms. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992) Justice O’Connor wrote the 6-3 majority opinion in a case about the respective roles of the federal government and the states under the 10th Amendment. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:09 am
In Sherdley & Anr v Nordea Life and Pension SA the Court of Appeal was asked to examine whether the English Court had jurisdiction to try a claim brought by British nationals who were not, at the time proceedings were commenced, resident in the UK. [read post]