Search for: "Human v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 19,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 9:08 am by Howard Friedman
Article 8 of the ECHR protects the right to respect for family and private life.In Obst v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
The legal basis: Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the European Convention on Human Rights, the duty on States to hold free and fair elections, has been receiving more than its usual share of attention. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm by Lawfare Editors
  The best response is to quote myself: “Modern IHRL already includes some such state human rights duties,” which I follow with an example (pp. 79-80). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
While in terms of international law and standards non-state actors carry a limited range of human rights responsibilities, in light of the use of the pro homine principle in human rights, where a non-state actor is acting on behalf of the State — or performing a state function directly — their obligations are not limited to respecting human rights, but also fulfilling them. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
– The Human Rights Roundup August 9, 2011 Melina Padron Will the Detainee Inquiry be human rights compliant? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
The UK Supreme Court Blog posted commentaries on the cases of AB v Ministry of Defence and R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:31 am
. - Law) has posted United States Detention Operations in Afghanistan and the Law of Armed Conflict (Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, forthcoming). [read post]