Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 541 - 560
of 760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
The 1935 case Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Edelman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
Humphrey; the court finds that there was insufficient evidence in the record to determine the issue, and that the defendant had the duty of creating a record to support his claim… Another good sentencing decision from the 2nd District in State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc., March 7, 2017, Humphrey, T.). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am
Indeed, both Upjohn and before Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova (joined Cases C-427/93, 429/93 and 436/93) had indicated that “the requirement of artificial partitioning of the markets does not imply that the importer must demonstrate (emphasis added) that, by putting an identical product on the market in varying forms of packaging in different Member States, the trade mark proprietor deliberately sought to partition the markets between Member States“. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:06 am
Humphreys, P. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Later, on 16 October 2019, the Advocate General (AG) at the CJEU delivered his much-awaited opinion in the matter Sky v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:44 pm
C-487/07, L’Oreal v Bellure), recognized that there are other functions, in particular that of guaranteeing the quality of the goods or services in question and those of communication, investment or advertising which deserve protection. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 12:29 am
In 2006 the Danish Commercial Court (“The Court”) made another decision regarding the shape of snack products (decision no V-116-04). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
But consider the range of national and state legislation and presidential action the Court held unconstitutional in one 17-month period starting in January, 1935: the NIRA, both its Codes of Fair Competition and the president's power to control the flow of contraband oil across state lines; the Railroad Retirement Act; the Frazier-Lemke Farm Mortgage Moratorium Act; the effort of the president to get the administrative agencies to reflect his political vision (Humphrey's… [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
The court refers to the CJEU case C 251/95 SABEL BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport, 11 November 1997 to hold that the mere association which the public might make between two trademarks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:53 am
In Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:38 pm
If confirmed, Bork would have provided the fifth vote to repeal Roe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:39 am
Conversely, to the recent case Coty v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:25 am
This decision highlights the importance of considering all forms of intellectual property rights when looking to protect a product, although it remains to be seen whether the UK Court will adopt a similar approach, as cases such as Lucasfilm v Ainsworth, demonstrate their reluctance to protect such utilitarian products through copyright. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm
– Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657 The case is Keeling v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am
However, already in Boehringer Ingelheim v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
