Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm
If you have questions about the impact of the new bill, or if you’re concerned about nursing home abuse and neglect, don’t hesitate to contact the California elder law attorneys at the Walton Law Firm.See Related Blog Posts: Elder Care at Home Upsides of California Assisted Living Care [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:26 am
Class Action Complaint Alleging Damages from Sale of CCA-Treated Wood did not Warrant Class Action Treatment as Defense Showed Individual Defenses and Individual Damage Analyses would Predominate over Fact Questions Common to Class Illinois Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in Illinois state court against Home Depot alleging violations of the state’s unfair and deceptive business practices statutes arising out of its sale of outdoor… [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Seyfarth attorneys Dawn Mertineit, Eric Barton, and Joshua Salinas will address the following topics: Recent state law changes related to restrictive covenants and non-competes and the potential impact of these changes Proposed restrictive covenant and non-compete legislation in various states Trends we’re seeing in restrictive covenant legislation and what changes we may see in 2022 Update on FTC / DOJ Non-Compete Workshop SpeakersDawn Mertineit, Partner,… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am
See In re St. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:46 am
Superior Court, 51 Cal.4th 310 (2011), and class certification cases discussing the UCL and CLRA, Stearns v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
That raises the question, if a vaccination mandate law allows for religious or personal belief exemptions, does that now vault it out of the land of rational basis review? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:32 am
Case law requiring plaintiffs to put forward exacting evidentiary proof in support of class certification is difficult to square with case law permitting defendants to move to strike class allegations without allowing plaintiffs even minimal discovery. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
The Ninth Circuit litigation is in a holding pattern due to the certification of a standing-related question to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:49 am
As a result, holders of the EPLS credential are the only attorneys in the State which can hold themselves out as estate planning specialists. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:08 am
Calling Plaintiffs’ Bluff Has Advantages Why bother to leverage Lundy into a dismissal if plaintiffs can simply re-plead with more specificity and raise “gap time” claims under the laws of many states, including New York? [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
” Signed into law by President Obama on Jan. 4, 2011, the act is the most sweeping reform of the nation’s food safety laws in 70 years. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:26 pm
If you have any further questions, you should reach out to an Arizona attorney with experience in medical marijuana laws. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:35 am
My written transcript:] I’m Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, where I direct the school’s Privacy Law Certificate. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:30 pm
If the president does not provide the required certification, Congress can (but is not required to) re-impose sanctions under expedited procedures provided for in INARA within 60 calendar days of the certification deadline. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 4:20 pm
Moreover, the court explained that res judicata did not preclude relitigating whether the certificate of occupancy allowed any Class B transient occupancy, since this was a “pure question of law. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Res. 37 becomes law. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:38 am
Answer: The law generally requires that applicants for naturalization must have resided continuously in the United States during a period of 5 years before applying (3 years in the case of qualified spouses of U.S. citizens). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
Answer: The law generally requires that applicants for naturalization must have resided continuously in the United States during a period of 5 years before applying (3 years in the case of qualified spouses of U.S. citizens). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
CONTACT MVP LAW GROUP, P.A. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
Therefore, it was not a question of law, as required for issues certified for interlocutory appeal. [read post]
